I think Sadhguru gave a good explanation but he could add to all that only one line that “Yes, legally nobody can stop women from entering any temple but spiritually it’s not good for them given the explanation but still nothing can stop them.” Whereas he took a new turn towards the Constitution of India which was completely unneccessary. Moreover, he was trying to prove that those DESCRIPTIONS of religious beliefs are more important than the Supreme Court of India’s judgements.
It’s all about how much importance you give to beliefs in personal life but in the era of constitutionalism, you can’t impose those beliefs socially on anyone no matter how much you think they have a stronger reason to be followed than law.
I Think For All 